The Palace of Deji of Akure has stated that it stopped the temporary approval granted for the usage of Akure Town Hall facilities by Omoyele Sowore, because it was done in a deceitful manner and not as result of harassment from any security agency.
This was disclosed in a statement issued by the palace and signed by the Chief Press Secretary to the Deji of Akure Kingdom, Mr. Michael Adeyeye, who said the approval was withdrawn by the Deji’s Palace Property Committee to forestall a breach of the fragile security in the state.
According to Adeyeye, the withdrawal became imperative when the Property Committee noted that the initial approval granted for a roundtable meeting of coalition of civil societies was in contrary to meeting point for procession, after the payment of N100, 000
He however, said the Committee which responsible for managing the facility had to withdraw the approval after noting that the request for the usage of the facility was done under a pretentious manner which conceal the real motive of the usage of the Hall.
The statement read : “the attention of the Palace of the Deji and paramount ruler of Akure kingdom have been drawn to a recent publication on the verified twitter handle of Mr Omoyele Sowore which had gone viral on some social media alleging that men of the Department of State Security Services came to threaten His Majesty, the Deji of Akure to reverse the initial approval granted for the usage of Akure Town Hall.
“We wish to state unequivocally that, there was never any time that the DSS threatened the Deji’s of Akure or anyone on the premise of seeking the reversal of the temporary approval granted for the usage of Akure Town Hall by the Deji’s Palace Property Committee
“For the avoidance of doubt and save for the unsuspecting Public, the withdrawal of the approval earlier granted by the Deji’s Palace Property Committee which is saddled with the responsibility of managing the facility was sequel to the fact that the request for the usage of the facility was done under a pretentious manner which conceal the real motive of the usage of the hall”
He explained that “It is an established standard that, anyone or organizations requesting the usage of the hall or any community facilities for any activities must make full disclosure of the purpose of the usage.
“Without mincing words, the hall is made available for all activities including social events, religious activities, and political gatherings and rally amongst others.
” However, concealing the real motive for a gathering for which an approval for the usage of the hall is sought negates the standing rules for getting the facility approval”
Adeyeye said; “However, the initial approval granted which necessitated the payment of a deposit of one hundred thousand naira was for a roundtable meeting of coalition of civil societies and not for a meeting point for any procession.
“While the palace strongly acknowledges the right of individual organizations and societies to lawful assembly, procession and protest as the case may be in a democratic society, But, seeking the approval for the usage of palace facility or any other should not be done in a deceitful manner as such action will leave the Palace Property Committee with no option than reversing any approval granted under such manner.
“We wish to inform the General Public that the approval for the usage of the facility was not in anyway as a result of any form of threat or harassment from DSS or any quarter but rather on the fact that the approval was seek in a fraudulent manner which negates the rules for seeking the usage of the hall”.
Meanwhile, Counsel to Sowore, Temitope Temokun, however, said excuse and turning back to withdraw the approval initially granted for the use of the hall by the Property committee was an afterthought, speculative and unpatriotic.
Temokun in a statement signed by him, said
“It will be recalled that Mr Omoyele Sowore called a town hall meeting for the Ondo state capital, Akure, on Saturday, the 16th of December 2023, to meet with the patriotic citizens of the state, his homestate, on the ways to navigate out of the state of political stalemate that the protracted illness and long absence from the state of the governor of the state, Mr Oluwarotimi Akeredolu, had caused and the incidental power unrest between the State House of Assembly, the deputy governor, Mr Lucky Ayedatiwa and some members of the executive council presenting to be loyal to the ailing governor.
If the hall is made available for all activities, including political gatherings and rally, as stated by Mr Adeyeye, then what other motive had been discovered to have led to the discriminatory unilateral cancellation of the granted licence which was paid for without any opportunity to wait to hear from My Omoyele Sowore if the use is for any illegal purpose other than what Mr Adeyeye said the hall is available for, that is, “all activities including social events, religious activities, and political gatherings and rally amongst others”, in My Adeleye’s quoted words.
“While the palace reserves the discretion to determine who is allowed to use the town hall for any legal purpose, cancelling a licence already given upon payment of the demanded fees for the use, on an allegation of securing the use through concealment of real purpose, is not just a breach of contract which is actionable and for which we shall press suit for redress, but also very discriminatory, as no credible reason or explanation had been adduced for the cancellation.
“We challenge the palace to come out with full details of the concealment alleged by the palace and the disclosure the palace now discovered to be the concealed purpose for taking up of the hall, because the statement issued by Mr Michael Adeyeye, stated that the decision to rescind the approval of the town hall use was because the facility was allegedly booked under a ‘pretentious manner’ to conceal the real motive of the usage.
“We are challenging the palace to disclose the “pretentious manner” or the false motive given and disclose the real motive it discovered and the source of its information, because the hall had not been used, let alone for any illegal purpose!
“It should be noted that the statement from Mr Adeyeye hinted that the initial approval granted by Mr Sowore for the usage of the town hall, which necessitated the payment of a deposit of N100,000, was for a roundtable meeting of a coalition of civil societies rather than for a meeting point for any procession.
“This is self-contradictory and unfortunate, because the palace had said the hall is available for all activities including political gathering and even rallies. Now what has changed? How will the palace justify allegation of concealment of purpose now, when the hall had not been used for any other purpose than the meeting of coalition of civil societies? Or will the palace feign ignorance of the meaning of civil society coalitions?
“The problems of governance vacuum in Ondo State affect all of us. And we own the state together. It is high time the palace faced the reality that Akure is a dual-character city and not just an indigenous kingdom but also state capital which by virtue of that belongs, in that capacity, to all Ondo State citizens.
‘Omoyele Sowore is not just a pro-democracy campaigner, but a political leader, a two-time presidential candidate in this country, leader of a registered political party, African Action Congress, with members who cut across the State and an indigene of Ondo State from Kiribo in Ese-Odo Local Government Area of Ondo State. So what disentitles him from coming to the state capital to address his people on the constructive absence of governance in the state?
“If the palace is afraid of a “procession” or a street protest, as unintentionally but tacitly revealed in Mr Adeleye’s Press Statement, the town hall was not booked for a procession or a street protest because a procession or street protest cannot take place inside a hall as there is a clear difference between a town hall meeting and a street protest because the town hall is not a street”.
READ ALSO FROM NIGERIAN TRIBUNE
