Appeal Court affirms,

Court turns down request to compel INEC to strike out Tinubu’s name

262
Reach the right people at the right time with Nationnewslead. Try and advertise any kind of your business to users online today. Kindly contact us for your advert or publication @ Nationnewslead@gmail.com Call or Whatsapp: 08168544205, 07055577376, 09122592273

A Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, on Friday, turned down a request for an order of mandamus to compel the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), to expunge the name of the Presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Bola Ahmed Tinubu, from the list of qualified candidates for the 2023 presidential election.

The trial Judge, Justice Binta Nyako, in her judgement dismissed the suit which accused the APC of failing to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 90 (3) of the Electoral Act, 2022, in nominating Tinubu as its presidential candidate.

The suit numbered: FHC/ABJ/CS/1960/2022, was filed by a non-governmental organization, the Incorporated Trustees of Kingdom Human Rights Foundation International.

The Judge held that the plaintiff, not being a registered political party in the country, lacked the locus-standi (legal right) to file the action, adding also that the plaintiff had earlier filed a similar suit that was dismissed for want of merit.

Though the court accused the plaintiff of engaging in an abuse of judicial process through the multiplicity of actions, however, commended its lawyer, Mr Jideobi Johnmary for his erudition.

According to the court, since the plaintiff had no right to file the action, there was no need to consider any of the issues it raised against Tinubu.

The plaintiff had prayed the court for, “A declaration that having regard to the clear, unambiguous and express provisions, spirit and tenor of Section 90 (3) read alongside Section 84 (13) of the Electoral Act 2022, the 1st defendant, has deliberately refused to exercise the powers, mandate and statutory duty/obligation bestowed on him in Section 84 (13) of the Electoral Act 2022, to immediately exclude, expunge and remove the 3rd defendant’s name, Bola Ahmed Tinubu from the final list of presidential candidates contesting the 2023 presidential election for failure of the 2nd Defendant to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 90 (3) of the Electoral Act 2022.

READ FROM ALSO NIGERIAN TRIBUNE 

“A declaration that by operation of law and having regard to the clear, unambiguous and express provisions, spirit and tenor of Section 90 (3) read alongside Section 84 (13) of the Electoral Act 2022, the 3rd defendant Bola Ahmed Tinubu, is not a candidate for the 2023 Presidential election, and he is automatically excluded, expunged, and removed from participating in the 2023 presidential election for failure of the 2nd Defendant to comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 90 (3) of the Electoral Act 2022 in nominating the 3rd defendant as its presidential candidate.

“An order of mandamus directing and compelling 1st defendant to exercise the powers, mandate and statutory duty/obligation bestowed on him in Section 84 (13) of the Electoral Act 2022, to immediately exclude, expunge and remove the 3rd Defendant’s name Bola Ahmed Tinubu from the final list of presidential candidates contesting the 2023 presidential election for failure of the 2nd Defendant to comply with the mandatory provisions of section 90 (3) of the Electoral Act 2022 in nominating the 3rd defendant as its presidential candidate”.

“An order nullifying and setting aside as illegal, null and void, the nomination of the 3rd defendant as the presidential candidate of the 2nd defendant for failure of the 2nd defendant to comply with the mandatory provisions of section 90 (3) of the Electoral Act 2022”.

The plaintiff argued that by the provision of Section 90 (3) of the 2022 Electoral Act, no political party in Nigeria is allowed to receive any contribution, of cash or kind, exceeding N50 million, without showing the source of the contribution to INEC.

However, both the APC and Tinubu, who were cited in the suit as 2nd and 3rd Defendants, filed preliminary objections to challenge the competence of the suit.

The Defendants described the suit as non-justiciable, adding that it was statute barred since it was not filed within 14 days after Tinubu’s name was submitted to the INEC.

Consequently, they prayed the court decline jurisdiction and dismiss the suit.

 


Reach the right people at the right time with Nationnewslead. Try and advertise any kind of your business to users online today. Kindly contact us for your advert or publication @ Nationnewslead@gmail.com Call or Whatsapp: 08168544205, 07055577376, 09122592273



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

mgid.com, 677780, DIRECT, d4c29acad76ce94f