Retaining old naira notes will encourage vote-buying, CBN tells court

Retaining old naira notes will encourage vote-buying, CBN tells court

246
Reach the right people at the right time with Nationnewslead. Try and advertise any kind of your business to users online today. Kindly contact us for your advert or publication @ Nationnewslead@gmail.com Call or Whatsapp: 08168544205, 07055577376, 09122592273

By-Hakeem Gbadamosi, Akure

The Central Bank of Nigeria ((CBN), has justified its decision not to extend the expiry date for the old Naira notes, saying it was designed to save the nation’s democracy and to discourage vote-buying in the coming presidential election.

The Counsel to CBN, O. M. Atoyebi (SAN) and Co., gave this reasons in a counter-affidavit in a suit filed against the apex bank by a group,  Social Rehabilitation Grace and Supportive Initiative  (SRG) led by a Nigeria-born United States medical practitioner,  Dr. Marindoti Oludare.

The group had dragged the CBN before a Federal High Court in Akure, asking the Court to compel CBN to extend the expiry date for the old Naira notes by six months, while the apex bank prayed the court to dismiss the suit, saying that the plaintiffs had no justifiable reason for filing it.

However, the CBN Counsel in the interlocutory injunction said the CBN opposed “the extension (of expiry date for old naira  notes of N200, N500 and N1000)  saying it will give room for vote-buying and undermine the forthcoming  election.

It also added that “the extension of the timeliness will jeopardise the fight against fraud, corruption  and criminal activities perpetrated with the use of the old currencies”. It specifically  cited the festering kidnapping  crime, claiming a change in currency  notes will end it.

Countering the SRG’s reference to currency change in India in 2016 in which the group said the Indians were given enough time to replace old Indian rupees, the CBN differed in its narration of the Indian experience.

It said, “The government  of India announced the change of their legal tender on November 8, 2016 and was implemented within two days.

“The entire citizens of India of about 1.417 billion adhered to the timeliness strictly, which has led to positive improvement of the Indian economy.”

The SRG maintained that the CBN acted beyond its powers by setting a timeliness for the expiration of the old Naira notes.

The group told the court that “While we know of a fact that the CBN has the right to denominate the Naira, it has no right to erase the value acquired  by individuals.

“The administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan also redesigned currency  notes, following which the new and old naira notes were both legal tender for over two years before the old notes went out of circulation”.

Oludare, the first plaintiff, also stated, “When I visited Nigeria from the United States of America  on December 29, 2022, I went to Automated Teller Machine operated by First Bank of Nigeria Plc in Lagos to make some cash withdrawals  but the machine dispensed only the old notes”.

He said the CBN had failed to also provide a means whereby Nigerians resident abroad could exchange their old notes.

The SRG remarked that the time given by the CBN could not be considered a reasonable  time, “as contained  in Section 20 (3) of the CBN Act 2007, considering the population of the country, which according  to Worldometre elaboration of the United Nations ‘ data, stands at about 219, 375,886; about 2.64% of the world population”.

The group averred that setting a hurried expiry date for the old naira notes at a time Nigeria is preparing for a major election smacked of mischief and could derail a smooth transition from one government to another.

It said India did the same thing in 2016 but that they sought a cessation of liability ordinance in order for the old notes to cease from being a legal tender. And the rupees were readily  available in all banks during this period.

“The cessation of liability is not in the CBN act hence they do not have the right to stop being liable for those old notes,” the group appraised.

In the suit therefore, the four plaintiffs, namely Oludare, Omoyele Ishola and Demola Obadofin, prayed the court to extend the February 10, 2023 for the expiration of the old naira notes by six months.

The applicants are also seeking, among others, an interim injunction restraining “the respondents and her privies,  agents, or servants from enforcing the deadline date of 10th February 2023, wherein the old N200, N500, and N1000 currency notes cease to be legal tender, pending the hearing and determination  of the motion on notice”.

The applicants also add that the court should give “an order compelling the respondent to extend the submission  of old N200, N500 and N2000 currency notes, by a minimum of six moths before same are finally called in and cease to be a legal tender,  pending the hearing and determination  of the motion on notice”.

The applicants demanded for an order of interim injunction restraining the respondent from setting a deadline for setting old N200, N500  and N1000 currency notes, saying such is alien to the provisions of the CBN Act 2007, pending  hearing and determination  of the motion on notice.

The plaintiff Counsel, L.E Ukpabi, averred that the the scarcity of naira notes occasioned by the redesigning of N200, N500 and N1000  notes had brought untold hardship to the Nigerian public, as the notice for the swap was too short.

READ ALSO FROM NIGERIAN TRIBUNE 

 

 


Reach the right people at the right time with Nationnewslead. Try and advertise any kind of your business to users online today. Kindly contact us for your advert or publication @ Nationnewslead@gmail.com Call or Whatsapp: 08168544205, 07055577376, 09122592273



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

mgid.com, 677780, DIRECT, d4c29acad76ce94f