Presidential election court consolidates APM, Obi, Atiku’s petitions

Supreme Court appoints panel to hear Atiku, Obi’s appeal

155
Reach the right people at the right time with Nationnewslead. Try and advertise any kind of your business to users online today. Kindly contact us for your advert or publication @ Nationnewslead@gmail.com Call or Whatsapp: 08168544205, 07055577376, 09122592273

The Supreme Court of Nigeria has constituted a seven-member panel of justices to hear appeals from three presidential candidates challenging the results of the February 25 election.

The Court has officially served notices for the hearing to Atiku Abubakar of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Peter Obi of the Labour Party (LP), and Chichi Ojei of the Allied Peoples Movement (APM).

The notices, signed by Zainab M. Garba in the registrar’s office, confirm that the relevant parties have been duly notified, in accordance with the Supreme Court’s Rules of 1985.

The panel of justices assigned to review the appeals includes Adamu Jauro, Uwani Musa Abba Aji, Lawal Garba, Helen M. Ogunwumiju, I.N. Saulawa, Tijjani Abubakar, and Emmanuel Agim.

Atiku Abubakar’s appeal argues that the Presidential Election Petitions Court made an error in dismissing his petition.

He asserts that they failed to sufficiently prove allegations of irregularities in the presidential election, the 25 per cent requirement in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), a $60,000 forfeiture, and the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) failure to transmit polling unit results to the IREV using BVAS, as mandated by its laws and guidelines.

Additionally, Atiku’s counsel, Chris Uche (SAN), has sought permission to file academic records, which he claims are forged, of his opponent, Tinubu.

Peter Obi maintains that the tribunal’s rejection of the blurred results from 18,088 polling units amounted to a miscarriage of justice.

Chichi Ojei, representing the APM, has raised concerns about the validity of Tinubu and his deputy, Kashim Shettima, nominations for office.

Tinubu’s defense, as presented by his counsel, Wole Olanipekun (SAN), argues that Atiku’s petition amounts to an abuse of the court process and lacks merit.

Similarly, he describes Obi’s petition as lacking in substance and merit.

YOU SHOULD NOT MISS THESE HEADLINES FROM NIGERIAN TRIBUNE

How Sunday Igboho got his freedom — Prof Akintoye

The leader of Ilana Omo Oodua, a self determination movement for Yoruba nation, Professor Banji Akintoye, on Saturday, declared that

FULL LIST: 43 items that are no longer contraband for importation

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has removed restrictions on the importation of all 43 items that

How N16 almost made me to drop out of school —Prof Ogundana

Celina Folakemi Ogundana, an academic and professor of Sociology, is the

I don’t have billionaire boyfriend, I lied —Mercy Eke

Former Big Brother Naija winner, Mercy Eke, has set the record straight by admitting that she

Kenyan authorities arrest fake lawyer who won 26 cases in court

Kenyan authorities have arrested a fake lawyer, Brian Mwenda, who has won 26 cases while parading

2023 AFCON: Super Eagles will be difficult opponent for Cote d’Ivoire — Drogba

Cote d’Ivoire legend Didier Drogba has predicted a difficult duel against the Super Eagles of


Reach the right people at the right time with Nationnewslead. Try and advertise any kind of your business to users online today. Kindly contact us for your advert or publication @ Nationnewslead@gmail.com Call or Whatsapp: 08168544205, 07055577376, 09122592273



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

mgid.com, 677780, DIRECT, d4c29acad76ce94f