The Supreme Court, on Tuesday, reserved its judgement on two separate appeals seeking to nullify the election of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu of Lagos State.
A five-member panel of Justices of the Apex Court, led by Justice Inyang Okoro, okayed the two cases for judgement after all the parties in the appeals adopted their briefs of argument.
The appeals were filed by candidates of the Labour Party (LP) and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the governorship election that was held in the state on March 18, Mr Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour and Abdulazeez Adediran (Jandor), respectively.
The apex court reserved the judgement for a date that would be communicated to all the parties in the matter.
The appellants are praying to the apex court to nullify the declaration of Sanwo-Olu of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) as the valid winner of the governorship election.
Specifically, the LP and its governorship candidate, Rhodes-Vivour, in the notice of appeal they filed on November 26, urged the court to, among other things, determine whether Sanwo-Olu was qualified to contest the election considering that his deputy and running late, Obafemi Hamzat, has dual citizenship.
The appellants told the court that the Lagos State deputy governor took the citizenship of the United States of America (USA) and argued that since the deputy governor was constitutionally ineligible to contest the election, it invalidated Sanwo-Olu’s candidature.
However, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Sanwo-Olu and his deputy, as well as the APC, urged the apex court to dismiss the appeal for lack of competence.
Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), who represented both Sanwo-Olu and his deputy, Hamzat, noted that both the Lagos State Governorship Election Petitions Tribunal and the Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed the petition by the LP and its candidate as lacking in merit.
He accused the appellants of deliberately attempting to change the case they presented before the two lower courts.
According to him, whereas the appellants, at the lower court, contended that the deputy governor renounced his Nigerian citizenship, Olanipekun, said the case before the apex court was changed to the alleged acquisition of US citizenship by the 3rd respondent (Hamzat).
All the respondents argued that the case the appellants presented before the Supreme Court was at variance with what was pleaded and decided by both the tribunal and the appellate court.
The Respondents told the court that the case of the LP and its candidate was also dismissed on the premise that they failed to prove the allegations in their petition, having produced incompetent witnesses and filed ineffective processes and
urged the court to dismiss the appeal and uphold the concurrent findings of the two lower courts on the matter.
Similarly, the PDP and its candidate, Adediran, alleged in their own appeal that they were denied a fair hearing by both the tribunal and the Court of Appeal.
The appellants, through their lawyer, Mr Clement Onwenwunor (SAN), maintained that their case was not heard and determined on its merit by the tribunal.
Onwenwunor told the apex court that the case of his clients was that the deputy governor tendered a forged West African Examination Council (WAEC) certificate to INEC in aid of his qualification to contest the election.
He added that a master list that WAEC was subpoenaed to produce before the tribunal showed that the name on the certificate the deputy governor tendered to INEC was different.
The appellants argued that such a discrepancy was weighty enough to affect the eligibility of the 2nd and 3rd respondents to participate in the gubernatorial contest.
While all the respondents asked the court to dismiss the suit for lack of jurisdiction, they further argued that the appeal was seeking to invoke the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Section 22 of its Act to review evidence that was not considered by the lower courts.
More so, the APC, through its lawyer, Mr Muiz Banire (SAN), argued that the appeal raised pre-election issues that have not only become statute-barred but on which they also lack the locus standi to litigate.
After the apex court panel heard the submissions of counsel to all the parties, it reserved the appeal for judgement, even as it noted that the statutory period for the determination of the case would elapse on January 12.
Meanwhile, the court deferred until January 9, 2024, the hearing of governorship election disputes from both Plateau and Cross River States.
The apex court fixed the date after it was notified on Tuesday that all the parties in the appeals from the two states have been served with all the relevant processes.
It ordered that INEC should be served with the hearing notice.
YOU SHOULD NOT MISS THESE HEADLINES FROM NIGERIAN TRIBUNE
How I helped Peter Obi overcome impeachment plot as Anambra governor — Sowore
Self-styled human rights activist, Omoyele Sowore has revealed an age-long secret about Peter Obi, the Labour Party presidential candidate in…
Yuletides: Low-key Christmas looms as poultry birds price rise than last years’
In less than 10 days to Christmas, the price of poultry birds in Ibadan is projected to be higher than last year mostly because of…
Comedian Mark Angel apologises over Emanuella’s viral dance video
Nigerian comedian Mark Angel has issued an apology following the circulation of a viral video featuring his…
A 35-year-old suspect, Akeem, who was arrested by detectives in Ogun State Police Command after…
Top 13 facts about Buhari at 81
As he marks his 81st birthday on Sunday December 17th, roughly six months after the completion of his two terms as…
CAF crowns Nigeria’s Osimhen African Player of the Year
Super Eagles striker, Victor Osimhen, has been crowned the African Player of the Year 2023 by the Confederation of…
