IN a dramatic turn of events, former Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, fled to Russia in the early hours of Sunday, December 8, accompanied by his family, after rebels captured the capital, Damascus. Russia granted Assad asylum, marking the end of his 13-year rule during Syria’s bloody civil war.
The leader of the rebel forces, Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, made it clear that those involved in the torture and killing of prisoners under Assad’s regime would not be pardoned. “We will pursue them in Syria, and we urge other countries to extradite those who fled so justice can be served,” Jolani stated. Since Assad’s ouster, thousands of Syrians have flocked to the regime’s notorious prisons, desperately searching for loved ones who disappeared during the years of brutal repression. A 2022 report by the Turkey-based Association of Detainees and the Missing in Saydnaya Prison (ADMSP) described Saydnaya prison as having “effectively become a death camp” after civil war erupted in 2011. The atrocities committed there epitomise the horrors of Assad’s regime. Jolani also announced plans to dismantle the former regime’s security forces, though questions remain about how quickly the rebels can establish stability amid concerns of external threats, including potential Israeli strikes on Syria’s military infrastructure.
The fall of Assad’s government has highlighted the deep corruption that characterised his rule. Reports reveal that Assad owned several garages filled with luxury vehicles, including Aston Martins, Lamborghinis, and Ferraris. These cars, along with his palaces adorned with intricate mosaics and marble, stand as stark symbols of the regime’s greed and extravagance. While Assad lived lavishly, ordinary Syrians endured poverty, hunger and the horrors of war. This stark inequality was a driving force behind the uprising that began in 2011, following decades of repression under Assad and his father, Hafez al-Assad. For 14 years, Syrians suffered relentless bombardment, torture, kidnappings, and mass killings, while the Assad family lived like royalty. Assad’s fall mirrors the fate of Afghanistan’s former president, Ashraf Ghani, who fled the country as the Taliban retook power. Like many authoritarian leaders, Assad’s refusal to relinquish power earlier has left him disgraced, with even his father’s grave reportedly desecrated. Assad could have exited honourably but instead chose to cling to power at the expense of his people.
The situation in Syria serves as a stark reminder of the perils of authoritarian rule and highlights the critical importance of democratic governance. Authoritarian leaders who refuse to relinquish power often drive their nations into cycles of unrest, repression, and eventual collapse. History is replete with examples of rulers who cling to authority despite growing dissatisfaction, often leading to their disgraceful downfall and immense suffering for their people.
Haiti, for instance, has endured decades of political instability and economic hardship exacerbated by entrenched corruption and ineffective governance. In Africa, a pattern of sit-tight leadership continues to impede progress. Leaders like Rwanda’s Paul Kagame, Uganda’s Yoweri Museveni and Cameroon’s Paul Biya have extended their grips on power for decades, often amending constitutions or suppressing dissent to maintain their dominance. While some have justified their prolonged rule with promises of stability or economic growth, the reality for many citizens is a lack of political freedom, stunted development, and systemic inequality. The costs of such governance, from civil unrest to stalled social progress, are borne most heavily by ordinary people.
In Syria, the Assad regime epitomised the worst excesses of authoritarianism. Over more than a decade of civil war, the government’s brutal tactics, including mass arrests, torture and bombings of civilian areas, devastated the nation. Meanwhile, the regime’s corruption and opulence stood in stark contrast to the suffering of ordinary Syrians. Assad’s eventual downfall demonstrates that no amount of wealth or power can indefinitely shield a leader from the consequences of governing through fear and repression. As Syrians begin the arduous process of rebuilding their country after years of war, they face both an immense challenge and an opportunity. The path forward requires not only addressing the physical and economic devastation but also establishing a political system rooted in accountability, justice and inclusivity. The global community has a vital role to play in supporting these efforts, from providing humanitarian aid to ensuring that international policies do not enable the resurgence of oppressive forces.
Read Also: We have ‘no interest’ in Syria conflict — Netanyahu
The Syrian tragedy underscores the fact that democracy, with its emphasis on free and fair elections, checks and balances, and respect for human rights, is a far more sustainable model for governance than authoritarianism. While democratic systems are not without flaws, they offer mechanisms for accountability and adaptability that authoritarian regimes inherently lack. Leaders who prioritise personal gain over the well-being of their people often leave a legacy of destruction and resentment. In contrast, those who embrace democratic principles, even at the cost of personal power, contribute to lasting peace and progress. The lesson from Syria, and from countless other nations, is clear: governance based on oppression is a path to ruin, while democracy, though challenging, offers the best hope for a just and prosperous future.
