Gov. Babajide Sanwo-Olu, Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour, and Abdulazeez Adeniran (a.k.a. Jandor)

Tribunal reserves judgement in petitions against Sanwo-Olu’s re-election

180
Reach the right people at the right time with Nationnewslead. Try and advertise any kind of your business to users online today. Kindly contact us for your advert or publication @ Nationnewslead@gmail.com Call or Whatsapp: 08168544205, 07055577376, 09122592273

Lagos State election petition tribunal has reserved judgement in two petitions against the re-election of Gov. Babajide Sanwo-Olu, and his deputy, Obafemi Hamzat.

The three-man tribunal led by Justice Arum Ashom, on Saturday, said it would communicate the date for the judgement to the parties in the petition.

Mr Ashom made this known after counsel to the parties adopted final written addresses.

Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour of the Labour Party (LP) and Abdulazeez Adeniran (a.k.a. Jandor) of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) are challenging re-election of Messrs Sanwo-Olu and Hazmat of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is the first respondent in the petition, while Messrs Sanwo-Olu and Hamzat are the second and third respondents, respectively.

APC is the fourth respondent.

The governorship election took place on March 18.

The two petitioners were absent in court on Saturday but Mr Hamzat was present.

Mr Sanwo-Olu’s counsel, Wole Olanipekun (SAN), while adopting his final written address, asked the court to dismiss the petitions for lack of merit.

He described the petitions as an academic exercise.

He said that there was no reference to the second respondent in the addresses of the petitioners, adding that the addresses dwelt on the third respondent.

“They have abandoned their petitions and also abandoned any issues against the second respondent.”

He said that non-qualification of the deputy governor for the election, as claimed by Mr Rhodes-Vivour, had no substance.

Mr Olanipekun argued that the allegation of Mr Hamzat’s renunciation of Nigerian citizenship and swearing to oath of allegiance to the U.S. were not sufficiently proven.

Similarly, counsel to APC, Abiodun Owonikoko (SAN), submitted that the argument about Mr Hamzat’s citizenship was not duly proven by the petitioners.

Counsel to INEC, Charles Edosonwan (SAN), in adopting his final written address, asked the tribunal to dismiss the petitions for lack of evidence.

He said: “One of the issues raised by the petitioners is whether the election was conducted in substantial compliance with the Electoral Act.

“We say that they have provided no scintilla of proof to show it wasn’t.

“A petition erected on such an allegation was sought to be proven by 10 witnesses in a state that has 13,325 polling units.

“The petition is materially challenged,” he said.

Olatunji Benson, counsel to LP and its Mr Rhodes-Vivour, asked the tribunal to uphold the position of his clients that Mr Hamzat did not qualify to contest the election.

He prayed the tribunal to remove Messrs Sanwo-Olu and Hamzat from office and declare Mr Rhodes-Vivour the governor of Lagos State.

Also adopting his final written address, counsel to PDP, Clement Onwuenwunor, argued that Mr Sanwo-Olu did not have a secondary school leaving certificate and, therefore, was not qualified to be governor.

(NAN)


Reach the right people at the right time with Nationnewslead. Try and advertise any kind of your business to users online today. Kindly contact us for your advert or publication @ Nationnewslead@gmail.com Call or Whatsapp: 08168544205, 07055577376, 09122592273



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *